<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>free_LUNCH &#187; Personal Stake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vibhavagarwal.com/blog/tag/personal-stake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vibhavagarwal.com/blog</link>
	<description>a BLOG by vibhav agarwal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 02:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Risk vs. Uncertainty</title>
		<link>http://www.vibhavagarwal.com/blog/2010/01/14/risk-vs-uncertainty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vibhavagarwal.com/blog/2010/01/14/risk-vs-uncertainty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vibhav Agarwal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rantings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Decision Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Stake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncertainties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncertainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vibhavagarwal.com/blog/2010/01/14/risk-vs-uncertainty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; All “risks” have some “uncertainties”, but not the other way around. A good example from Wikipedia is: We can be uncertain about the winner of a contest, but unless we have some personal stake in it, we have no risk. If we bet money on the outcome of the contest, then we have a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-left: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4058/4273570080_b188a92980.jpg" border="0" /> </p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>All “risks” have some “uncertainties”, but not the other way around. A good example from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk#Risk_versus_uncertainty" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a> is:</p>
<blockquote><p>We can be uncertain about the winner of a contest, but unless we have some personal stake in it, we have no risk. If we bet money on the outcome of the contest, then we have a risk. In both cases there are more than one outcome.</p>
</blockquote>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vibhavagarwal.com/blog/2010/01/14/risk-vs-uncertainty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

